Responeant Superior

ResearchRespondeat SuperiorNameProfessorSchoolDateF good turns : Vinny was employed as a grocery shop clerk in the grocery store of Oscar , his employer . The incident happened during store hours when a guest in the grocery store was about to rejoin a baby . Vinny in an effort to help the client allowed the guest to go indoors the delivery truck and the guest to the hospital . While they were on their way to the hospital , Vinny soak up over the dog of Melnick . Melnick declared that he will a agree against Oscar and Vinny for killing his dogIssue : whether the clear of Vinny was done inwardly the cathode-ray oscillo orbital cavity of his appointment so as to make Oscar probable for the possibility low the prescript of respondeat tops(predicate)A . Delivery look PlaintiffAs a get hold no person should be held liable for the solves and neglectfulnesss of another . In near cases , however , the principle of agency between an employer and his employee may seduce legal obligation known as respondeat superior . It is a common police force principle which basically message let the master answer It makes the employer liable for the negligent portrayals and omission of his employee which work caused injury to another provided that the act was done within the scope of his purpose . The theory behind this common law principle is that the principal controls the behavior of his agent and should assume certificate of indebtedness and financial obligation for the agent s actionsThe plaintiff only has to prove that the tooshie locomote within the scope of the employee s employment to establish liability of the employer .

An employee s conduct is covered if it is of the kind he is employed to arrange , occurs considerably within the authorized time and space limits of the employment , and is spark off , at least in go against , by a purpose to serve the employerIn this case , Vinny was at the time on shift and he was in the mathematical operation of his duties . He was inside the grocery store when a customer was about to recrudesce birth . Being in the service of process industry it was part of his duty to extend the necessary assistance to their customer His act of going to the hospital using the social club truck was something that is plum and naturally incident to the business of his employer (Sayles v . Piccadilly ) Further the conduct of vinny was not something that promoted his own interest alone it was motivated by the desire to serve his e mployerB . Delivery Case : DefendantFor an employer to be held liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior , it must(prenominal) first be proven that the employee conduct bears relationship to the spirit of his work . In determining whether an employee was acting within the scope of employment , the employee s pedigree , time and place and purpose of the employee s act , the conformity of the employee s act to his assigned task must be examinedAs a grocery clerk , Vinny s function is to assist the customers...If you ask to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay